From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: NilsRadtkelkml@Think-Future.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 15:22:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100503192219.GE25748@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100503191756.GA3479@localhost>
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 09:17:56PM +0200, NilsRadtkelkml@Think-Future.de wrote:
> Strangely, as stated in the previous message, this bug does only happen in conjunction at a specific
> geographical position, so far it only happened there that is. How does this correlate with the designated
> code at line 2076 in iwl-agn-rs.c?:
>
> /* Sanity-check TPT calculations */
> BUG_ON(window->average_tpt != ((window->success_ratio *
> tbl->expected_tpt[index] + 64) / 128));
Interestingly enough, we have been discussing this line of code today. Could you try the patch here?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=127290931304496&w=2
Does it address the issue you are experiencing?
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-03 19:17 kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock NilsRadtkelkml
2010-05-03 19:22 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2010-05-06 9:14 ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-06 16:28 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-11 15:50 ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-11 17:21 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-12 15:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-10 18:36 ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-10 23:32 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-12 14:39 ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-12 23:14 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-13 10:34 ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-13 11:32 ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-13 16:31 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-14 17:45 ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-13 15:05 ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-17 23:19 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-20 12:15 ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-20 18:33 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-31 20:12 ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-02 17:51 ` reinette chatre
2010-06-04 16:57 ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-08 17:46 ` reinette chatre
2010-06-10 14:22 ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-10 16:19 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-20 12:31 ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-20 18:26 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-20 22:30 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-11 9:41 Nils Radtke
2010-04-29 18:26 kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076,was: iwlagn + some accesspoint = hardlock lkml
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100503192219.GE25748@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=NilsRadtkelkml@Think-Future.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.