From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs: allow short direct-io reads to be completed via buffered IO
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 09:07:58 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100504230758.GD8120@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100504152749.GB2573@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 11:27:50AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:14:18AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 01:27:02PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > This is similar to what already happens in the write case. If we have a short
> > > read while doing O_DIRECT, instead of just returning, fallthrough and try to
> > > read the rest via buffered IO. BTRFS needs this because if we encounter a
> > > compressed or inline extent during DIO, we need to fallback on buffered. If the
> > > extent is compressed we need to read the entire thing into memory and
> > > de-compress it into the users pages. I have tested this with fsx and everything
> > > works great. Thanks,
> >
> > Won't this mean that any direct IO read that spans EOF (i.e. get a
> > short read) now attempt a buffered IO (that will fail) before returning?
> >
>
> Hmm yeah you are right. What would be an acceptable way to avoid this, do a
>
> if (retval || !count || ppos >= i_size_read(inode))
> goto out;
>
> type thing? Thanks,
Yes, that looks like it would work to me. Might be worth a comment,
though.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-03 17:27 [PATCH 1/3] fs: allow short direct-io reads to be completed via buffered IO Josef Bacik
2010-05-04 0:14 ` Dave Chinner
2010-05-04 15:27 ` Josef Bacik
2010-05-04 23:07 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-03 16:11 Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100504230758.GD8120@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.