From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Egger Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH] x86: add CMCI software injection interface Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 09:53:33 +0200 Message-ID: <201005050953.35004.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> References: <789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D30659731D8B3C40@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com> <4BE0EB6B.6090804@oracle.com> <4BE13E6E020000780000157E@vpn.id2.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BE13E6E020000780000157E@vpn.id2.novell.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jan Beulich Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "gavin.maltby@oracle.com" , Yunhong Jiang , Liping Ke , "Christoph@rcsinet11.oracle.com" , Keir Fraser , Frank Van Der Linden List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wednesday 05 May 2010 09:46:22 Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> Frank Van Der Linden 05.05.10 05:52 > >>> >>> > > > >I have no problems with this change. dom0/Xen should match in version > >anyway. There have been ABI breakages in the dom0/Xen interface before. > > When was it that you last saw an incompatible change to the interface? Between Xen 3.3 and Xen 3.4. > There shouldn't be a need to match up Dom0 and Xen versions, except > when you want support for newly added features. Correct. This is the point of backward-compatibility. Christoph -- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Andrew Bowd, Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632