From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [PATCH][cr-test] eclone-2 bug fix Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 08:59:09 -0500 Message-ID: <20100505135909.GB7204@us.ibm.com> References: <20100504020919.GB5098@us.ibm.com> <20100504133328.GA10214@us.ibm.com> <20100504173051.GA11116@us.ibm.com> <20100504193934.GA4781@us.ibm.com> <20100505020404.GA19821@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100505020404.GA19821-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org thanks, applied. Note that I'm also unhappy with tests which test for too specific an error value (see reported sysctl03 breakage in ltp just today). It's fragile. But I don't feel like tweaking this any more right now, and it's not like I'm sure that letting any <0 errno mean PASS is the way to go either. It's just that it's a maintenance pain... and I guess ltp should come to some conclusion about how to handle it. thanks, -serge