From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Deop i =?iso-8859-15?q?Argem=ED?= Subject: Re: i915GM 2D+3D intel driver regression Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 10:47:29 +0200 Message-ID: <201005061047.30128.damnshock@gmail.com> References: <7233.92507.qm@web110507.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <201005051559.34717.damnshock@gmail.com> <1273079871.19196.9.camel@segulix> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8239F9E74C for ; Thu, 6 May 2010 01:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so4618991fxm.36 for ; Thu, 06 May 2010 01:48:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1273079871.19196.9.camel@segulix> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Sergio Monteiro Basto Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Wednesday May 5 2010 19:17:51 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 15:59 +0200, Marc Deop i Argem=ED wrote: > > On Wednesday May 5 2010 03:31:51 Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > > If you use intel-drv shipped on distros, should have problems , do you > > > use ubuntu ? > > = > > Intel-drv? Don't have such a package... I should have problems? :S > = > xorg-x11-drv-intel > n require kernel > n and libdrm > n . What does that "n" mean? I don't understand that sentence. > = > > I'm happily running Archlinux > = > happily ? Yeah, happily. I love this distro :D > So maybe is yours fault , because 945GM works since early drives without > problems. It does work. However, not fine performancewise. And I am not the only one = to = say that... > Update only Xserver , the most probably that things stop work , after > that you should recompile all drives (including xorg-x11-drv-intel) , > see if xorg-x11-drv-intel requires a new libdrm and if libdrm requires a > new mesa etc . If so before compile Xserver , you should compile libdrm > and after that mesa. > So the order should be: > 1st kernel > 2nd libdrm > 3 mesa. > 4 Xserver > 5 all drives. I've done all that as my distro packages are not that updated yet. I even g= ot = the source from git. The problemes were still there... = > Top-posting is to read only the top of the posting , = I'm affraid you are mistaken. Top-posting is to write with the "replied" te= xt = below > If you know the > message , is more efficient . that looking for the answers in meddle of > the text. I'll give you that. However, I tend to get dozens (sometimes hundreds) of emails per day: I = usually *don't* know the message ;) Damnshock -- = A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?