From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Test Project <ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [04/12 FAILURE] LTP? sysctl03 test fails
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 13:39:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100506183947.GA14900@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <k2v364299f41005061059rf51273ffk7c8c9755b92427e5@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting Garrett Cooper (yanegomi@gmail.com):
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Quoting Garrett Cooper (yanegomi@gmail.com):
> > So since we're all member of the doc team, send a patch for sysctl(2)
> > manpage ERRORS section :)
> >
> > (mtk cc:d as this is probably news to him)
>
> I already have a bug outstanding for it:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15446
That's not what I said :)
> >> > An LSM could choose to return -EPERM
> >> > after all, or perhaps even something different. The thing that
> >> > should scare us is if the call succeeds. If we give any false
> >> > positives, then true positives will seem less scary.
> >>
> >> This will fail on older kernels as sysctl(2) always returned EPERM due
> >
> > Sorry - what will fail?
>
> Read through the link, and you will understand why your new proposed
> patch with fail with a false negative.
I'm not sure that thread means what you think it does.
But look, just trying to help. And no time for it really. I'll drop
this.
-serge
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-06 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-06 6:55 [LTP] [00/12 FAILURE] Reporting LTP run issues on Fedora 13 ppc6 Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:56 ` [01/12 FAILURE] LTPX Memory CGROUP test creates Call Trace and Badness at mm/oom_kill.c:393 Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:56 ` [02/12 FAILURE] LTPX File Capabilities tests becomes defunct and does not complete beyond 12 hours Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:56 ` [03/12 FAILURE] LTPX Memory Conroller test fails and hangs system for more than " Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:56 ` [04/12 FAILURE] LTPX sysctl03 test fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 8:05 ` [LTP] [04/12 FAILURE] LTP? " Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 13:53 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-05-06 17:38 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 17:55 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-05-06 17:59 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 18:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2010-05-07 9:05 ` Subrata Modak
2010-05-07 9:22 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 6:57 ` [05/12 FAILURE] LTPX proc01 " Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 8:04 ` [LTP] [05/12 FAILURE] LTP? " Garrett Cooper
2010-07-27 17:37 ` Subrata Modak
2010-07-27 17:38 ` Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:57 ` [LTP] [06/12 FAILURE] Many CONTAINER tests of LTP fail Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 17:53 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 17:59 ` Dan Smith
2010-07-27 17:40 ` Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:57 ` [07/12 FAILURE] LTPX MEMORY CGROUP FUNCTION tests fails Subrata Modak
2010-07-28 17:34 ` [LTP] [07/12 FAILURE] LTPE " Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:58 ` [08/12 FAILURE] LTPX clock gettime03 fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 7:04 ` [LTP] [08/12 FAILURE] LTPE " Suzuki Poulose
2010-05-06 7:55 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 9:03 ` Suzuki Poulose
2010-05-06 17:42 ` Garrett Cooper
2010-05-07 8:53 ` Subrata Modak
2010-06-01 15:40 ` Suzuki Poulose
2010-06-02 12:57 ` Subrata Modak
2010-07-27 18:03 ` Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:58 ` [09/12 FAILURE] LTPX timer create04 fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-07 2:12 ` [LTP] [09/12 FAILURE] LTP " Henry xu
2010-07-28 12:46 ` [LTP] [09/12 FAILURE] LTPE " Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:58 ` [10/12 FAILURE] LTPX ar01 fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 6:58 ` [11/12 FAILURE] LTPX file test fails Subrata Modak
2010-05-06 8:01 ` [LTP] [11/12 FAILURE] LTP? " Garrett Cooper
2010-05-06 6:59 ` [12/12 FAILURE] LTPX cron tests fails Subrata Modak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100506183947.GA14900@us.ibm.com \
--to=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=yanegomi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.