From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 UPDATED] scheduler: replace migration_thread with cpu_stop
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 11:42:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100506184252.GC2325@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE2EEB0.6020402@kernel.org>
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 06:30:40PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 05/05/2010 10:31 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Almost. With the following patch, I am good with it.
>
> Ah, right. What was I thinking? I'll include your patch and push it
> to Ingo. Thanks.
And of course, I overdid it in my patch when I removed smp_mb() from
the !SMP version of synchronize_sched_expedited(). :-/
If synchronize_sched_expedited() is ever to be invoked from within
kernel/sched.c in a UP kernel, there needs to be a "barrier()" in the
!SMP version. So please see the following patch.
Thanx, Paul
commit 0eab52c0eeeb8507a83bdb37cc8f690b1c4f4a2c
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu May 6 11:40:17 2010 -0700
rcu: need barrier() in UP synchronize_sched_expedited()
If synchronize_sched_expedited() is ever to be called from within
kernel/sched.c in a !SMP PREEMPT kernel, the !SMP implementation needs
a barrier().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 155a16d..fbaf312 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -8932,6 +8932,7 @@ struct cgroup_subsys cpuacct_subsys = {
void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
{
+ barrier();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_sched_expedited);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-06 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-04 13:47 [PATCHSET sched/core] cpu_stop: implement and use cpu_stop, take#2 Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpu_stop: implement stop_cpu[s]() Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 13:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] stop_machine: reimplement using cpu_stop Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 13:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] scheduler: replace migration_thread with cpu_stop Tejun Heo
2010-05-05 1:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-05 7:28 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-05 17:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-05 18:10 ` [PATCH 3/4 UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-05-05 20:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-06 16:30 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-06 18:42 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-05-07 5:24 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 13:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] scheduler: kill paranoia check in synchronize_sched_expedited() Tejun Heo
2010-05-04 18:52 ` [PATCHSET sched/core] cpu_stop: implement and use cpu_stop, take#2 Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-05 7:30 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100506184252.GC2325@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.