From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756832Ab0EFTUH (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 15:20:07 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:54593 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754233Ab0EFTUE (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 15:20:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 12:18:16 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vadim Rozenfeld , Avi Kivity , Gleb Natapov , Peter Zijlstra , Haiyang Zhang , Hank Janssen Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: detect running on a HyperV system Message-ID: <20100506191816.GA20874@kroah.com> References: <20100506190841.GA1605@kroah.com> <4BE314CD.6060701@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BE314CD.6060701@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 12:13:17PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 05/06/2010 12:08 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > > > x86-maintainers, we need this patch in the tree to get a -staging driver > > to work properly. If you don't object, can I take it through the > > staging tree? Or do you want to take it in -tip? > > > > I'd prefer to take it in -tip, partly because I would like to rework a > few things -- including preexisting braindamage like c->x86_hyper_vendor > (since when was hypervisor vendor a per-cpu property!?) Heh, good point, but where should it live? And I have no objection to taking it in -tip, thanks for doing so. > I'll try to get to it today, if not feel free to bug me. Will do :) thanks again, greg k-h