From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932536Ab0EFU1e (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 16:27:34 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:58407 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932183Ab0EFU1d (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 16:27:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 13:04:04 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kay Sievers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Cornelia Huck , Eric Dumazet , Benjamin LaHaise , Serge Hallyn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] netns support in the kobject layer Message-ID: <20100506200404.GA21805@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:35:54PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > With the tagged sysfs support finally merged into Greg's tree, > it is time for the last little bits of work to get the kobject > layer and network namespaces to play together properly. > > These patches are roughly evenly divided between network layer work > and sysfs layer work. Last time this conundrum came up I believe > we decided that the easiest way to handle this was for Greg to carry > all of the patches. David, Greg does that still make sense? That's fine, if I get David's ack on these. thanks, greg k-h