From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
bhaskie@gmail.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 10:14:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100507101451.1b4286b7@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273210329.2222.42.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Fri, 07 May 2010 07:32:09 +0200
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le jeudi 06 mai 2010 à 22:04 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
> > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>
> > > This code should be completely rewritten for linux-2.6.35, its very ugly
> > > and over complex, yet it is not scalable.
> > >
> > > It could use true percpu data, with no central lock or refcount.
> >
> > Yes I've always disliked the way the TCP MD5 pool stuff is coded, it's
> > frankly crap and this is like the 5th major bug that had to get fixed
> > in it. :-)
> >
> > But let's fix this as simply as possible in net-2.6 and -stable, so Eric
> > let me know when you have a tested patch for me to apply.
>
> There are so many things ...
>
> I am comtemplating commit aa133076
>
> __tcp_alloc_md5sig_pool() now do a :
>
> p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), sk->sk_allocation);
>
> But later call :
>
> hash = crypto_alloc_hash("md5", 0, CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC);
>
> (GFP_KERNEL allocations for sure)
>
>
> tcp_v4_parse_md5_keys() also use :
>
> p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), sk->sk_allocation);
>
> right after a (possibly sleeping) copy_from_user()
>
> Oh well...
>
>
> I'll test the already suggested patch before official submission,
> thanks.
Forget the per cpu data; the pool should just be scrapped.
The only reason the pool exists is that the crypto hash state which
should just be moved into the md5_info (88 bytes). The pseudo
header can just be generated on the stack before passing to the crypto
code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-07 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <i2h571fb4001005031027y4a58c4dtfd28ddcdc08d8401@mail.gmail.com>
2010-05-04 3:30 ` TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-04 11:32 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-05-04 14:28 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-04 16:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-04 17:08 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-04 17:13 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-05 18:03 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-05 18:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-06 11:55 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-06 12:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 5:04 ` David Miller
2010-05-07 5:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 17:14 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2010-05-07 17:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 17:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-07 21:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 14:55 ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-10 15:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-10 17:27 ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-11 4:08 ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-11 6:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-11 8:23 ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-11 20:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-12 3:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-12 22:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-12 22:24 ` David Miller
2010-05-16 19:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-16 20:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-17 3:49 ` Bijay Singh
2010-05-17 5:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-17 17:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-17 20:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-17 21:04 ` [PATCH] tcp: tcp_synack_options() fix Eric Dumazet
2010-05-18 5:35 ` David Miller
2010-05-16 7:30 ` TCP-MD5 checksum failure on x86_64 SMP David Miller
2010-05-07 8:46 ` Lars Eggert
2010-05-07 8:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 9:12 ` David Miller
2010-05-07 5:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 8:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 8:59 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-07 9:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 10:50 ` Bhaskar Dutta
2010-05-07 15:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 15:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-07 21:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-16 7:37 ` David Miller
2010-05-16 7:35 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100507101451.1b4286b7@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=bhaskie@gmail.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.