From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 08:26:06 -0700 From: Greg KH Message-ID: <20100507152606.GA18943@kroah.com> References: <201005072243.12054.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201005072243.12054.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman patch authorship mangled Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marek Lindner Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net, Luis de Bethencourt On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 10:43:11PM +0800, Marek Lindner wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > the last patchset sent by Andrew contained a few errors regarding the > authorship due to incorrect handling on our side. We did not notice these > issues until the patches went out to get included by you. Ick. > Here is the complete list of incorrect assignments: > * should be Linus instead of Simon > => [PATCH 07/26] staging:batman-adv: Remove dead max addr and obsolete > VIS_FORMAT strings > => [PATCH 09/26] staging:batman-adv: Update README about vis raw output > > * should be Luis instead of Marek > => [PATCH 12/26] staging:batman-adv: fix whitespace style issues > > * should be Sven instead of Marek > => [PATCH 24/26] staging:batman-adv: Fix whitespace problems criticized by > checkpatch.pl > => [PATCH 25/26] staging:batman-adv: Reduce max characters on a line to 80 > > Is there any way to correct the authors of the patches in question ? I know > that modifying the git history to fix the author will change all following > hashes and everyone has to rebase its tree. > Personally, I'm not so worried about Linus & Sven, since they are longterm > contributors and somewhat close to the project. I'm sure a beer or two can > compensate them for the loss of fame. Luis on the other hand seemed to be > quite thrilled about getting his patch in and I'd rather not leave him with > the impression we don't want to credit him for his work. Hm, ok, I'll try to rebase the whole tree :( Can you resend me the set of 26 patches with the correct authorship set so I know I get it right? thanks, greg k-h