From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] __setup_vector_irq: handle NULL chip_data Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 11:35:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20100510153513.GJ29517@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <> <1273501247-27267-11-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1273501247-27267-11-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 03:20:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini > --- > arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > index 96f6bba..976646f 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > @@ -1287,6 +1287,8 @@ void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu) > /* Mark the inuse vectors */ > for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) { > cfg = desc->chip_data; > + if (!cfg) > + continue; > if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cfg->domain)) > continue; > vector = cfg->vector; Most curious. This looks be fixed upstream: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/30/458 Do you know why the chip_data isn't set?