From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pv0-f175.google.com ([74.125.83.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBWCK-0000PB-1N for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 10 May 2010 18:51:18 +0200 Received: by pvc30 with SMTP id 30so60555pvc.6 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:47:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WiXbHd8mFA/Vk1GRVJoVD6PO08Fs8xSv4e8wQhFaHXM=; b=VTCOSkDWRJGTqINSxU1LcEPpe9jNNvFeICdVDqsCA65shs31zSwSD1KWAHlNHw8JcS O1zUksZ9OdL1RoFOaLbbu1aaCvNfEB7udsumIBRUuh4UizhrjkYBCEYildqGRWqez4ZG j1CTLc+G8UePHvhCGlHVlC2vG7BTN1kA0b1R0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=nNkpQwU4KPRsztfvEkmdcYfgGbHB/IxmrnTP8kSaYwRFXAaK7u3NN/Kl0o74tfYe6w EPq5mJAjKHOILHWBO/p+tbiJ8fdpFJZ3+85RFd4pTwHQHkSgpSQ7zt8FVw1SJYiOjmzp 6yKabiAjGOjEDDmQyorAXgqKuUxPeeH6SmaYw= Received: by 10.140.251.20 with SMTP id y20mr2809349rvh.206.1273510042524; Mon, 10 May 2010 09:47:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b10sm1989352rvn.3.2010.05.10.09.47.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 10 May 2010 09:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 09:47:31 -0700 From: Khem Raj To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100510164731.GB11797@gmail.com> References: <1273249883.457.336.camel@trini-m4400> <1273331468.22943.217.camel@trini-m4400> <1273429494.22943.225.camel@trini-m4400> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 74.125.83.175 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: raj.khem@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: calamari (ppc e500v2) failure X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 16:51:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On (10/05/10 10:40), Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/5/9 Tom Rini : > > On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 08:11 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > >> On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 09:06 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > >> > 2010/5/7 Tom Rini : > >> > > Hey all, > >> > > > >> > > With DISTRO=minimal and MACHINE=calamari, I see the following failure in > >> > > gnutls (using fe4ff6940b06c73d5b88224b99750bf65accf13d in oe.dev): > >> > > http://pastebin.com/cjAStcLb and I confirmed this prior to the RP merge, > >> > > so this is unrelated. > >> > > >> > Which eglibc is that? > >> > The issues I had seemed due to some catch22 situation that I cured; I > >> > started a clean build yesterday before I left work & can tell the > >> > results on monday. > >> > My distro was angstrom, machine calamari, this uses eglibc 2.10. Is > >> > minimal also using 2.10 or is it at 2.11 > >> > > >> > I can also try to kick off a minimal build on monday > >> > >> minimal is eglibc 2.10.  I'll try an Angstrom build. > > > > With Angstrom, gcc-cross-initial fails building libgcc, config.log has: > > cc1: error: not configured for ABI: 'spe' > > configure:2591: $? = 1 > > configure: failed program was: > > ... standard empty program ... > > configure:2605: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot > > compile > > > > Ubuntu 9.10 x86_64 host > > > > I made a mistake when doing the clean build, and kicked it off again. > I don't think I saw your error. > In my local.conf I have: > > MACHINE = "calamari" > DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" > ANGSTROMLIBC = "eglibc" > > # e500v2 supports the SPE instruction set. > TARGET_OS = "linux-gnuspe" > > Perhaps the TARGET_OS line influences how libgcc is build. yes. if you look at the gcc-configure-cross.inc then it disables optspace for SPE targets. thats why it works for gnuspe but when I did that I only saw the problem on gnuspe and wanted to keep the effect minimal. But it seems now we need this ppc wide thats why the new patch. Although using -Os in kernel might cause the same problem even if we sort out libgcc because kernel does not use libgcc and I dont know if it implements these functions. If this causes the issue then we have to do same fix for kernel where we compile kernel with -O2 and not with -Os Thx -Khem > > Frans > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel