From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pete Zaitcev Subject: Re: e1000e fails probe Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 22:43:08 -0600 Message-ID: <20100510224308.4334fd11@redhat.com> References: <20100510185018.3478bcae@redhat.com> <8DD2590731AB5D4C9DBF71A877482A90010D1DE754@orsmsx509.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , zaitcev@redhat.com To: "Allan, Bruce W" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28395 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751561Ab0EKEnF (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2010 00:43:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8DD2590731AB5D4C9DBF71A877482A90010D1DE754@orsmsx509.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 10 May 2010 18:33:56 -0700 "Allan, Bruce W" wrote: > Would you be able to try a patch that is already in DaveM's net-next-2.6 tree? If so, it is http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=627c8a041f7aaaea93c766f69bd61d952a277586 I was too quick to claim victory here. I did an rmmod+insmod, it worked. Then I rebooted and it didn't. Weird... -- Pete