From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757319Ab0EJVJq (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2010 17:09:46 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:38134 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757183Ab0EJVJn (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2010 17:09:43 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: platform_bus: Allow runtime PM by default Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 23:10:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.34-rc6-rjw; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Mark Brown , Greg KH , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org References: <1269625370-17754-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20100507132746.GA3425@sirena.org.uk> <20100507162028.022a737c@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20100507162028.022a737c@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005102310.55838.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 07 May 2010, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Mark, > > On Fri, 7 May 2010 14:27:46 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:41:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > Jean, the patch we're discussing depends on the > > > "i2c: Fix bus-level power management callbacks" patch that's in your tree right > > > now. Would it be possible to move the i2c patch to my tree, or alternatively > > > would it be acceptable for you to merge a core PM patch through your tree? > > > > Jean, any updates on this? > > I'm sorry, I never received Rafael's initial message. I just checked > through my mailbox and it isn't there. > > The current status is that patch "i2c: Fix bus-level power management > callbacks" is currently queued in my i2c tree at: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/i2c-fix-bus-level-power-management-callbacks.patch > and is scheduled to be merged in 2.6.35-rc1. If this isn't OK, we can > change the plan. > > Merging a core PM patch through the i2c tree would be quite confusing, > I think, and might draw even more odd dependencies. So I'd rather have > the i2c patch moved to the PM staging tree (or whatever tree the > dependent patch lives in.) Just let me know and I'll drop my copy. The patch above has been applied to suspend-2.6/linux-next along with the Mark's $subject patch. I have converted your sign-off into an ack, hope that's fine. Thanks, Rafael