diff for duplicates of <20100511034138.GA19762@owl>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 646d8ab..ebf830f 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ On 08:45 Mon 10 May, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
 > > -		  0x17 (Penryn 45nm), 0x1a (Nehalem), 0x1c (Atom),
 > > -		  0x1e (Lynnfield) */
 > > -		if ((c->cpuid_level < 0) || (c->x86 != 0x6) ||
-> > -		    !((c->x86_model = 0xe) || (c->x86_model = 0xf) ||
-> > -			(c->x86_model = 0x16) || (c->x86_model = 0x17) ||
-> > -			(c->x86_model = 0x1a) || (c->x86_model = 0x1c) ||
-> > -			(c->x86_model = 0x1e))) {
+> > -		    !((c->x86_model == 0xe) || (c->x86_model == 0xf) ||
+> > -			(c->x86_model == 0x16) || (c->x86_model == 0x17) ||
+> > -			(c->x86_model == 0x1a) || (c->x86_model == 0x1c) ||
+> > -			(c->x86_model == 0x1e))) {
 > 
 > So we remove something that checks the CPU level for a model we *expect*
 > to find a thermal sensor, and only throws a KERN_WARNING if we're on a
@@ -39,8 +39,3 @@ I think the better one is KERN_INFO here.
 -- 
 Thanks
 Huaxu
-
-_______________________________________________
-lm-sensors mailing list
-lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
-http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 16c80c1..ee93913 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
  "ref\020100510033525.GC9181@owl\0"
  "ref\0148928.1273495551@localhost\0"
  "From\0Huaxu Wan <huaxu.wan@linux.intel.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/2 V2] hwmon: (coretemp) Detect the\0"
- "Date\0Tue, 11 May 2010 03:41:38 +0000\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/2 V2] hwmon: (coretemp) Detect the thermal sensors by CPUID\0"
+ "Date\0Tue, 11 May 2010 11:41:38 +0800\0"
  "To\0Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu\0"
  "Cc\0Huaxu Wan <huaxu.wan@linux.intel.com>"
   linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
@@ -20,10 +20,10 @@
  "> > -\t\t  0x17 (Penryn 45nm), 0x1a (Nehalem), 0x1c (Atom),\n"
  "> > -\t\t  0x1e (Lynnfield) */\n"
  "> > -\t\tif ((c->cpuid_level < 0) || (c->x86 != 0x6) ||\n"
- "> > -\t\t    !((c->x86_model = 0xe) || (c->x86_model = 0xf) ||\n"
- "> > -\t\t\t(c->x86_model = 0x16) || (c->x86_model = 0x17) ||\n"
- "> > -\t\t\t(c->x86_model = 0x1a) || (c->x86_model = 0x1c) ||\n"
- "> > -\t\t\t(c->x86_model = 0x1e))) {\n"
+ "> > -\t\t    !((c->x86_model == 0xe) || (c->x86_model == 0xf) ||\n"
+ "> > -\t\t\t(c->x86_model == 0x16) || (c->x86_model == 0x17) ||\n"
+ "> > -\t\t\t(c->x86_model == 0x1a) || (c->x86_model == 0x1c) ||\n"
+ "> > -\t\t\t(c->x86_model == 0x1e))) {\n"
  "> \n"
  "> So we remove something that checks the CPU level for a model we *expect*\n"
  "> to find a thermal sensor, and only throws a KERN_WARNING if we're on a\n"
@@ -52,11 +52,6 @@
  "\n"
  "-- \n"
  "Thanks\n"
- "Huaxu\n"
- "\n"
- "_______________________________________________\n"
- "lm-sensors mailing list\n"
- "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org\n"
- http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
+ Huaxu
 
-b5f9eb3d6d8ed7aad44f621d54f9ae968146c7b9ae9e11e6d1fa7dd4e0cad79e
+e8f1216c1b632788b72b6ba6215e644342e522ef6a04bde068de7bdc8265e4a4
