From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBhHI-0005Ot-68 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 11 May 2010 06:41:08 +0200 Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so3103391fxm.6 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 21:37:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8oDpoeYaVh4Sie3mGJAAvAuEyaKyP3ZtmyXeI3Z+OWU=; b=j+bd/tBM6idiE/6X4LZitQ/RA5FNx+kfAzt9rgeZfX6lir7Vy8r+Jg6rdB0F6JqNYm IAB0jP6joKYLliTivbSXUxPv62byt90UHRGJNsfPq674wccRaGuukNZ/7KoRuvjcgFA+ kuPxkQiUD+e1wQCINEZpYMM67il5OjjAk3uII= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=jY9qNzURUiqfcQIQbna++Y+CC3xMAHkialqrohkg5rNcSLPBEqDnkAR5aFdcCwRCd0 ils2GXllMk2Xo+cjLAcoocuENOQ6VPRzJ9CWQ6Do+hPWCxkevYvlhNBt8h/VLpe/xL2J w4RcY2Vf8yl6p6jszPz+iaBVigojJcP8rfSck= Received: by 10.223.45.83 with SMTP id d19mr5425635faf.65.1273552635349; Mon, 10 May 2010 21:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u12sm24764878fah.4.2010.05.10.21.37.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 10 May 2010 21:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 06:37:15 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100511043715.GA3285@jama> References: <20100510232720.GA13708@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100510232720.GA13708@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.161.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] Move gcc 4.4.3 recipes in favour of 4.4.4 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 04:41:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 04:27:20PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi > > I would like to propose to move gcc 4.4.3 recipes to gcc 4.4.4, > there are no additional patches that we need and 4.4.4 is superset > of bugfixes. I want to avoid adding additional recipes if we could. > 4.4.3 is not so widely used in distributions unlike 4.4.2 > > I can also just add 4.4.4 and leave 4.4.3 as it is if someone wants > to keep using 4.4.3 SHR is using 4.4.3 and I don't mind moving to 4.4.4. Thanks for adding it. > Please cast your concerns Any news about 4.5.0 producing segfaulting binaries on armv[45]t? -- uin:136542059 jid:Martin.Jansa@gmail.com Jansa Martin sip:jamasip@voip.wengo.fr JaMa