From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-px0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OBi4b-00089t-QC for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 11 May 2010 07:32:06 +0200 Received: by pxi14 with SMTP id 14so1858609pxi.6 for ; Mon, 10 May 2010 22:28:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=kIUnJ7Oz640M4WVpHTvs+RKaBJWKNch3bUXeH6/Jv6g=; b=f67tifKrCkugqShWkaVcvFl1yWcJexT76m/Rv7vVH5tXqGSoEipbQwtlgKtrVsdSfz sOxN/J/YLsi6g2/U/4625NraMp2NT8A7U75UaGJy0NaoG7yWYz4qKAMn13uhROjscWK7 mLrdvaGZ5XRr/F3gvqSP/lr9vsCvSukNwc1/k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ba5m85PUL+j3YpCitSziRZMzOikzrvj73kKprrrE2V8BeOxTMLVN3IIg2g2EpYjn1a DaZwYiDz7Lw8fcB1RJQ+whJ00qTcj+fHc+SjY5hBYG7Q4dHSHg3rrq+BO1t8gTDQLq0r zCYB3c2of2QCEgDuua57s1Z3p1ysyfMae0f0k= Received: by 10.115.84.8 with SMTP id m8mr4053000wal.9.1273555691611; Mon, 10 May 2010 22:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c22sm32018530wam.6.2010.05.10.22.28.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 10 May 2010 22:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 22:28:18 -0700 From: Khem Raj To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100511052818.GA14500@gmail.com> References: <20100510232720.GA13708@gmail.com> <20100511043715.GA3285@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100511043715.GA3285@jama> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.212.175 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: raj.khem@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] Move gcc 4.4.3 recipes in favour of 4.4.4 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 05:32:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On (11/05/10 06:37), Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 04:27:20PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > Hi > > > > I would like to propose to move gcc 4.4.3 recipes to gcc 4.4.4, > > there are no additional patches that we need and 4.4.4 is superset > > of bugfixes. I want to avoid adding additional recipes if we could. > > 4.4.3 is not so widely used in distributions unlike 4.4.2 > > > > I can also just add 4.4.4 and leave 4.4.3 as it is if someone wants > > to keep using 4.4.3 > > SHR is using 4.4.3 and I don't mind moving to 4.4.4. Thanks for adding > it. OK > > > Please cast your concerns > > Any news about 4.5.0 producing segfaulting binaries on armv[45]t? I have been able to reproduce it using 2.6.33 on osk5912 but no time to debug so far :( Thx -Khem