From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 09:25:21 -0700
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Current state of ath9k in linux release and
 compat-wireless
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinoGn7eBlTjNmqVz166almYIcIG3Z2pCs1bxDVf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <t2sf475b8d21005051753r86efff48n5c3efdff722d01ce@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100506163540.6571.qmail@stuge.se>
	<m2j133e8d7e1005071659vf26c70e8k430c51c618e94a9c@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100510180246.GA2177@tux>
	<AANLkTinoGn7eBlTjNmqVz166almYIcIG3Z2pCs1bxDVf@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100511162521.GA22460@tux>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:02:44AM -0700, Daniel Yingqiang Ma wrote:
> Could you clarify a little more about the AR9160? Is it also an
> unfortunate one as well?
> It seems we have been unlucky to choose this one...

AR9160 is part of the AR9100 family.

  Luis