From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 13:47:48 -0700 From: Greg KH Message-ID: <20100511204748.GA12704@kroah.com> References: <201005072243.12054.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> <20100507152606.GA18943@kroah.com> <20100507175607.GA3734@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman patch authorship mangled Reply-To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Id: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luis de Bethencourt Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.net, "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , Marek Lindner On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 07:54:36PM +0100, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > >> Greg, wait! > >> > >> No need for this. I understand the problem, can imagine why it > >> happened and I don't mind the wrong authorship. I prefer avoiding the > >> general head-ache of rebasing the whole tree. > >> > >> To be honest I noticed this in yesterday's emails but I decided to not > >> mention it. > >> > >> Marek, > >> Any beers for me then :P > > > > So, i will wait until somebody has time to visit the post office and > > work out which is cheaper: Beer to Greg, or Beer to Luis. > > > > =A0 =A0 Andrew > > >=20 > Make it for Greg :) Ok, I've rebased the staging-next tree on 2.6.34-rc6, reapplied the patches, and then took your 26 patches and applied them and pushed everything out. Can someone verify that I got it all correct? Oh, and you owe me one bottle of "Tactical Nuclear Penguin" :) thanks, greg k-h