From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibft: Use IBFT_SIGN instead of open-coding the search string. Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 12:33:23 -0700 Message-ID: <20100512123323.2badc5a7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <4BEAB683.8040600@redhat.com> <1273674308-9366-1-git-send-email-pjones@redhat.com> <201005121035.33199.konrad@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:38099 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757129Ab0ELTdo (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 15:33:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201005121035.33199.konrad@kernel.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Peter Jones , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gpxe-devel@etherboot.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 12 May 2010 10:35:32 -0400 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Please also consider this patch with the others I've sent. > I've put this (and the other ones) on: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/ibft-2.6.git dev.ibft Well, you're the maintainer and you have a git tree and I cannot tell the difference between an IBFT and a bar of soap. So I suggest that you ask Stephen to permanently include your git tree in linux-next and send Linus a pull request in the 2.6.35-rc1 merge window like so many other people do?