All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/10] Uprobes v3
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 19:34:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100512140433.GD13606@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273671560.1626.114.camel@laptop>

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 03:39:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 18:57 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> > Now, as long as we have the housekeeping code to handle the
> > possibility of a thread hitting the said breakpoint when its being
> > removed, is it safe to assume atomicity for replacing one byte of
> > possibly a longer instruction? 
> 
> Dunno I'm not a hardware guy, but the issue is so simple to side-step
> I'm not sure why you're arguing for relying on these special semantics.

Yes we know what to do, but I am just trying to get clarity if its
possible at all, since Mathieu was pretty sure that the hoops aren't
necessary...

Ananth

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-12 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-06 18:01 [PATCH v3 0/10] Uprobes v3 Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/10] X86 instruction analysis: Move Macro W to insn.h Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/10] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/10] x86 support for User space breakpoint assistance Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 4/10] Slot allocation for execution out of line (XOL) Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 5/10] Uprobes Implementation Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:02 ` [PATCH v3 6/10] x86 support for Uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 7/10] samples: Uprobes samples Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 8/10] Uprobes documentation Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 9/10] trace: uprobes trace_event interface Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 18:03 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] perf: perf interface for uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-06 23:13   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-05-07  2:24     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-07 17:53       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-05-09 11:18         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-11 20:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/10] Uprobes v3 Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-12 10:25   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-12 12:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-12 13:27       ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-05-12 13:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-12 14:04           ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
2010-05-12 14:46             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-12 16:55               ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-12 17:59                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-13 12:07       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-12 10:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-12 13:39   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-05-12 14:53     ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100512140433.GD13606@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mjw@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.