From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org, gorcunov@gmail.com,
aris@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] [nmi watchdog] touch_softlockup cleanups and softlockup_tick removal
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:06:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100512200652.GF10028@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273266711-18706-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 05:11:45PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> Just some code cleanup to make touch_softlockup clearer and remove the
> softlockup_tick function as it is no longer needed.
>
> Also remove the /proc softlockup_thres call as it has been changed to
> watchdog_thres.
>
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 16 +++-------------
> kernel/sysctl.c | 9 ---------
> kernel/timer.c | 1 -
> kernel/watchdog.c | 35 +++--------------------------------
> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 2455ff5..e9c6c1d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -308,18 +308,14 @@ extern void scheduler_tick(void);
> extern void sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP
> -extern void softlockup_tick(void);
> extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void);
> extern void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void);
> -extern int proc_dosoftlockup_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> - void __user *buffer,
> - size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> extern unsigned int softlockup_panic;
> extern int softlockup_thresh;
> +extern int proc_dowatchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> + void __user *buffer,
> + size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> #else
> -static inline void softlockup_tick(void)
> -{
> -}
> static inline void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
> {
> }
> @@ -338,12 +334,6 @@ extern int proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR
> -extern int proc_dowatchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> - void __user *buffer,
> - size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> -#endif
> -
> /* Attach to any functions which should be ignored in wchan output. */
> #define __sched __attribute__((__section__(".sched.text")))
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index 1083897..1fec781 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -827,15 +827,6 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
> .extra1 = &zero,
> .extra2 = &one,
> },
> - {
> - .procname = "softlockup_thresh",
> - .data = &softlockup_thresh,
> - .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> - .mode = 0644,
> - .proc_handler = proc_dosoftlockup_thresh,
> - .extra1 = &neg_one,
> - .extra2 = &sixty,
> - },
I wonder about the ABI breakage.
But I suspect few userspace tools use it though, since this is
mostly for kernel dev.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-12 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-07 21:11 [PATCH 0/8] lockup detector changes Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 1/8] [watchdog] combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup Don Zickus
2010-05-12 19:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-13 6:51 ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup detector tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 2/8] [nmi watchdog] touch_softlockup cleanups and softlockup_tick removal Don Zickus
2010-05-12 20:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-05-12 20:26 ` Don Zickus
2010-05-12 20:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-12 20:56 ` Don Zickus
2010-05-12 21:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-12 21:38 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-12 21:50 ` Don Zickus
2010-05-13 15:53 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-13 16:04 ` Don Zickus
2010-05-13 6:52 ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Touch_softlockup " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 3/8] [watchdog] remove old softlockup code Don Zickus
2010-05-13 6:52 ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Remove " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 4/8] [watchdog] remove nmi_watchdog.c file Don Zickus
2010-05-13 6:52 ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Remove " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 5/8] [x86] watchdog: move trigger_all_cpu_backtrace to its own die_notifier Don Zickus
2010-05-13 6:53 ` [tip:perf/nmi] x86: Move " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 6/8] [x86] watchdog: cleanup hw_nmi.c cruft Don Zickus
2010-05-13 6:53 ` [tip:perf/nmi] x86: Cleanup " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 7/8] [watchdog] resolve softlockup.c conflicts Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] [watchdog] separate touch_nmi_watchdog code path from touch_watchdog Don Zickus
2010-05-13 6:53 ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Separate " tip-bot for Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100512200652.GF10028@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=aris@redhat.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.