From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCVSC-0002le-6C for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 13 May 2010 12:15:44 +0200 Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so1038989fxm.6 for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 03:11:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=M1yKwGWRSoxavGP2R9S9JvupeaqzVRDGUlKBvKbAosU=; b=vvtzxxaP1Zfa8I24t88daetXgvKuYNmwA+at47L3k2ar1Z0Hg0iozVqGQ1AAid4tyM sDlAYh3wJWjeGld88ANoQ5fKCpciVg0//w4tVqTXCL3kxLlvmWZjxRQTqoJ04pQIsupk 6mZWqmHSpohwnIqHqzYXxdkUbUmt5O2nP3gDY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=hManK7ahmc6gOEAPjmC6C4sWJZOLwiqj7DfU8IWScWLHVIb7Mnrb570KdFDSc0CwtU GLzpsA8VenbBa1GXYyGsO0u9F64+tDmCMDY9Az/TmEtn/L+MgsHer1VTuCtDn7OkQTjN SJfeIOom+Pd3urEpvpflm2J6Q8Q0v+1xVIOKg= Received: by 10.223.29.156 with SMTP id q28mr2886086fac.77.1273745509215; Thu, 13 May 2010 03:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y12sm5165778faj.5.2010.05.13.03.11.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 13 May 2010 03:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 12:11:49 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100513101149.GI3370@jama> References: <201005131223.22252.khimov@altell.ru> <20100513084633.GC3370@jama> <201005131259.13508.khimov@altell.ru> <20100513092320.GE3370@jama> <20100513093814.GG3370@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100513093814.GG3370@jama> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.161.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: QEMU mmap_min_addr issue Was: some possible fixes in the OE web pages X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 10:15:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:38:14AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Can we compare this simple test between working and non-working systems? You can ignore both tests.. the difference is value of mmap_min_addr 4096 work OK 65536 fails for me too I'll patch qemu-native to assume 65536 when it cannot read mmap_min_addr. Cheers, -- uin:136542059 jid:Martin.Jansa@gmail.com Jansa Martin sip:jamasip@voip.wengo.fr JaMa