All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gdavis@mvista.com (George G. Davis)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] ARM: Implement read/write for ownership in theARMv6 DMA cache ops
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 16:34:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100513203423.GQ18984@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273760120.30713.67.camel@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

Hi,

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 03:15:20PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 14:54 +0100, George G. Davis wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 09:26:57AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 06:27 +0100, Ronen Shitrit wrote:
> > > > Our ARM v6 does have speculative prefetch...
> > >
> > > That's the I-cache and we should be ok with it. What may affect this
> > > patch is speculative fetches into the D-cache.
> > 
> > prefetch()?
> 
> Drivers should not use prefetch (PLD) on memory handed over to a device
> for DMA transfers. To me this is like explicitly accessing such memory
> during a DMA transfer.

I agree and was merely speculating that prefetch() may be a case where
D-Cache lines are explicitly prefetched and may be the cause of this
problem, e.g. from e1000_clean_rx_irq() in drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c:

	while (rx_desc->status & E1000_RXD_STAT_DD) {
		struct sk_buff *skb;
		u8 status;

		if (*work_done >= work_to_do)
			break;
		(*work_done)++;

		status = rx_desc->status;
		skb = buffer_info->skb;
		buffer_info->skb = NULL;

		prefetch(skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN);

		i++;
		if (i == rx_ring->count)
			i = 0;
		next_rxd = E1000_RX_DESC(*rx_ring, i);
		prefetch(next_rxd);

		next_buffer = &rx_ring->buffer_info[i];

		cleaned = 1;
		cleaned_count++;
		pci_unmap_single(pdev,
				 buffer_info->dma,
				 adapter->rx_buffer_len,
				 PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);


I'm to lazy^Wbusy to drill down but could the above prefetch(skb->data...)
before pci_unmap_single() or similar cases be causing the problem reported
by Ronen?

I think the above may be one of those "if drivers are expecting data in
the cache to be preserved over a dma_unmap_area() call, they are buggy
and need fixing." Russell noted in a previous post, no?

--
Regards,
George

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-13 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-04 16:44 [PATCH 0/8] Various patches for comments and upstream Catalin Marinas
2010-05-04 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/8] ARM: Improve the L2 cache performance when PL310 is used Catalin Marinas
2010-05-04 17:02   ` Jason McMullan
2010-05-05 16:07     ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-04 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/8] ARM: Implement read/write for ownership in the ARMv6 DMA cache ops Catalin Marinas
2010-05-04 17:04   ` Jason McMullan
2010-05-05 16:23     ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-05 13:26   ` George G. Davis
2010-05-06 14:40     ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-06 15:57       ` George G. Davis
2010-05-12 12:51   ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-12 13:55     ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-12 15:03       ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-12 18:48       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-12 18:59         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-12 20:00           ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-12 20:04             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-12 20:19               ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-12 21:21           ` [PATCH 2/8] ARM: Implement read/write for ownership in theARMv6 " Catalin Marinas
2010-05-13  5:27             ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-13  8:26               ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-13 13:54                 ` George G. Davis
2010-05-13 14:15                   ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-13 20:34                     ` George G. Davis [this message]
2010-05-14 16:29                       ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-14 16:42                         ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-15  1:26                           ` George G. Davis
2010-05-16  6:28                             ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-16  6:29                 ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-16 15:01                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-17  6:29                     ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-17  6:57                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-17  7:34                         ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-17  7:43                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-17  8:29                             ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-17  8:57                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-17  9:50                                 ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-17 10:03                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-17 11:26                                     ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-17 11:31                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-17 11:45                                         ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-17 10:00                           ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-17 11:29                             ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-17 11:42                               ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-17 12:04                                 ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-17 13:45                                   ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-17  9:51                   ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-17  9:57                     ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-17  9:59                       ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-17 11:08                         ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-17 11:27                           ` Ronen Shitrit
2010-05-17 11:47                             ` Catalin Marinas
2010-05-17 13:46                               ` [PATCH 2/8] ARM: Implement read/write for ownership intheARMv6 " Catalin Marinas
2010-05-04 16:44 ` [PATCH 3/8] ARM: Align machine_desc.phys_io to a 1MB section Catalin Marinas
2010-05-04 16:44 ` [PATCH 4/8] ARM: Remove the domain switching on ARMv6k/v7 CPUs Catalin Marinas
2010-05-04 16:44 ` [PATCH 5/8] ARM: Fix the __arm_ioremap_caller() definition in nommu.c Catalin Marinas
2010-05-04 17:19   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-04 16:44 ` [PATCH 6/8] ARM: Implement copy_to_user_page() for noMMU Catalin Marinas
2010-05-04 17:19   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-04 16:44 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: Use the Inner Shareable I-cache and BTB ops on ARMv7 SMP Catalin Marinas
2010-05-28 18:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-05-28 21:37     ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: Use the Inner Shareable I-cache and BTB opson " Catalin Marinas
2010-05-04 16:44 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: Implement phys_mem_access_prot() to avoid attributes aliasing Catalin Marinas
2010-05-04 16:48 ` [PATCH 0/8] Various patches for comments and upstream Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100513203423.GQ18984@mvista.com \
    --to=gdavis@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.