From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752937Ab0EMXjt (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2010 19:39:49 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:48084 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751591Ab0EMXjr (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2010 19:39:47 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 00:39:36 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Linus Torvalds , lenb@kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [git pull] Input updates for 2.6.34-rc6 Message-ID: <20100513233936.GA22338@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20100513075728.GF30110@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20100513181002.GB23708@core.coreip.homeip.net> <201005131405.45732.dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201005131405.45732.dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 02:05:44PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > But I guess because there are no devices plugged in ACPI they are "inactive" > and thus ACPI drop them. I was always wondered by ACPI did that. Len? Yeah, if _STA gives you 0 then the device won't be visible. That may not be optimal in this case. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org