From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 00:48:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.35] ARM: S3C6410: Add missing definitions for the
	IISv4 clock
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik-y2JU4w1m6muo6pez97nE_XY4fQPRuQkwExza@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1273771379-5729-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<AANLkTik-y2JU4w1m6muo6pez97nE_XY4fQPRuQkwExza@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20100513234808.GA4798@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:22:48AM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote:

>   Seems you missed the first three in the series?

> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-March/011036.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-March/011039.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-March/011038.html
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-March/011037.html

> I am ok with this Mark's single patch too though.

Either way works for me, I don't mind so long as my kernels build and
run.