From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX ] ipv6: fix the bug of address check
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:31:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100517103134.06160257@nehalam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF1354A.3060003@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Mon, 17 May 2010 20:23:38 +0800
Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> If there are several IPv6 addresses with same hash value in hashlist,
> and they are all not matched with addr argument.
> In this case, ipv6_chk_addr() should return 0.
>
> This bug is introduced by commit c2e21293c054817c42eb5fa9c613d2ad51954136
> (title: ipv6: convert addrconf list to hlist).
>
> Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index 3984f52..d8e5907 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -1291,7 +1291,7 @@ int ipv6_chk_addr(struct net *net, struct in6_addr *addr,
> }
> rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> - return ifp != NULL;
> + return node != NULL;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipv6_chk_addr);
>
Why not this instead. I don't like depending on the value of the
loop variable in the hlist_for_each()
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2010-05-17 10:27:58.218628126 -0700
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c 2010-05-17 10:29:46.012198338 -0700
@@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ static int ipv6_count_addresses(struct i
int ipv6_chk_addr(struct net *net, struct in6_addr *addr,
struct net_device *dev, int strict)
{
- struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp = NULL;
+ struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp;
struct hlist_node *node;
unsigned int hash = ipv6_addr_hash(addr);
@@ -1283,15 +1283,16 @@ int ipv6_chk_addr(struct net *net, struc
if (!net_eq(dev_net(ifp->idev->dev), net))
continue;
if (ipv6_addr_equal(&ifp->addr, addr) &&
- !(ifp->flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE)) {
- if (dev == NULL || ifp->idev->dev == dev ||
- !(ifp->scope&(IFA_LINK|IFA_HOST) || strict))
- break;
+ !(ifp->flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE) &&
+ (dev == NULL || ifp->idev->dev == dev ||
+ !(ifp->scope&(IFA_LINK|IFA_HOST) || strict))) {
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
+ return 1;
}
}
- rcu_read_unlock_bh();
- return ifp != NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipv6_chk_addr);
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-17 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-17 12:23 [PATCH BUGFIX ] ipv6: fix the bug of address check Shan Wei
2010-05-17 17:31 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2010-05-18 0:50 ` Shan Wei
2010-05-18 1:02 ` [PATCH net-next] " Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-18 5:27 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100517103134.06160257@nehalam \
--to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.