From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ns0.zlo.nu ([85.17.141.90] helo=mzh.zlo.nu) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODzRo-0004r4-GL for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:29:29 +0200 Received: by mzh.zlo.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6934B140DB; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:25:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:25:29 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100517122529.GA30953@zlo.nu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 85.17.141.90 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: marcolz@zlo.nu X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: on ubuntu 10.04, how to reset /bin/sh to refer to bash? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:29:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 09:58:04AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > On 12-05-10 18:58, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > my first time setting up to build OE on ubuntu 10.04, and trying to > > "bitbake fetch" complains that it's a bad idea for /bin/sh to refer to > > dash. fair enough, so since /bin/sh -> dash, do i just reset the > > symlink manually? or is there something more elegant? thanks. > > And for the record: It's not OE (anymore) that requires bash, it's the > software we build. E.g. GTK+'s libtool has bashisms. And there are a lot > more. Exactly. So depending on what you want to build, you can get away with dash as /bin/sh fine. We've been using the patch in http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/914/ successfully for some time now, but we do not need any GTK+ stuff on our images. Marc