From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ew0-f225.google.com ([209.85.219.225]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OE5U3-0005Ay-CM for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 20:56:12 +0200 Received: by ewy25 with SMTP id 25so1381934ewy.27 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 11:52:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HONEMMdbdB0ELbFh1vi45KaMkS4/VPJvx7UuKjbmWQ4=; b=PYPrMhf65l6gU764Z+9BkRmGQYgr7HuAImvfeb8Mkby2RqRnRKAZvtzGrOteKGEJOY cPTRdYoi1khn9dUOl1FSqMEsf6rNwfwq1Rp6urBUU38orhxvXRwSalWKx+HAsVvB+AwZ zRJOjzAfMnluh1RNGqgG8mCZQM9zBFK5CJIis= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=vFWjDehS+RO/KOOIcGJwzxtTTmdxAxpPifl26Y61N3m3jct/mT8Ql/lQTwKdCts9qb MqqYf6vDKGQIFNBxN+MjckUrvUIOU/K1rws580XCP5u4/nhjeAhYdyAFwwWkie329LEV bWIImmmizzS88Okc/4/mXHgTXB5F+Lmm74edA= Received: by 10.213.66.5 with SMTP id l5mr2791092ebi.71.1274122331755; Mon, 17 May 2010 11:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm2987274ewy.6.2010.05.17.11.52.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 17 May 2010 11:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 11:52:35 -0700 From: Khem Raj To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100517185235.GA7868@gmail.com> References: <20100517055550.GA6686@gmail.com> <1274119962.25944.147.camel@trini-m4400> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1274119962.25944.147.camel@trini-m4400> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.219.225 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: raj.khem@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Question: is 'gcc' supposed to replace the libstdc++.la installed by 'gcc-cross'? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 18:56:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On (17/05/10 11:12), Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 10:45 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On 17-05-10 18:49, Khem Raj wrote: > > >> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > > > >> I could not build a console-image as I ran out of disk space. Have you > > >> considered removing > > >> -g3 from default angstrom builds. > > > > what is -g3 offering over -g at -O2 and how good the additional debug info is ? > > -g3 offers lots of stuff, spelled out in some doc or another is macro > expansion, for example. I don't know if it offers enough stuff that you > say don't need the sources themselves around still too tho. Koen? If -g3 is intended, some options to reduce debug info size should be considered like -feliminate-dwarf2-dups -femit-struct-debug-baseonly -femit-struct-debug-reduced etc. -Khem