All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, tgraf@redhat.com, nhorman@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:14:48 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100519.131448.200085502.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100519082047.GA24331@gondor.apana.org.au>

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 18:20:47 +1000

> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:09:42AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> 
>> 6) netif_rx() pro is that packet processing is done while stack usage is
>> guaranteed to be low (from process_backlog, using a special softirq
>> stack, instead of current stack)
>> 
>> After your patch, tun will use more stack. Is it safe on all contexts ?
> 
> Dave also raised this but I believe nothing changes with regards
> to the stack.  We currently call do_softirq which does not switch
> stacks.

do_softirq() _does_ switch stacks, it's a per-arch function that
does the stack switch and calls __do_softirq() on the softirq
stack.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-19 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-19  7:57 tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx Herbert Xu
2010-05-19  8:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-19  8:18   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-19  8:21     ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-19 12:05     ` Neil Horman
2010-05-19 12:55       ` Neil Horman
2010-05-19 18:00         ` Neil Horman
2010-05-19 20:24           ` Neil Horman
2010-05-19 20:49           ` Thomas Graf
2010-05-19 21:00             ` Brian Bloniarz
2010-05-20  2:55               ` David Miller
2010-05-20  2:57                 ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-20  3:05                   ` David Miller
2010-05-20  3:34                     ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-20  3:42                       ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-20  3:46                       ` David Miller
2010-05-20  4:54                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-20  5:01                         ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-20  5:15                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-20  5:20                         ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-20  5:36                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-20  5:46                             ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-20  6:03                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-20  6:11                                 ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-20  6:19                                   ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-20  6:52                               ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-20  8:10                                 ` Thomas Graf
2010-05-20  9:40                                   ` Thomas Graf
2010-05-24  6:44                                 ` David Miller
2010-05-20 17:29                               ` Neil Horman
2010-05-20 23:16                                 ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-21  0:39                                   ` Neil Horman
2010-05-21  1:02                                     ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-21  1:16                                       ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-24  6:44                                         ` David Miller
2010-05-21  5:49                                     ` David Miller
2010-05-21 10:51                                       ` Neil Horman
2010-05-21 11:08                                         ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-21 12:59                                           ` Neil Horman
2010-05-21 16:40                                           ` Neil Horman
2010-05-22  1:49                                             ` cls_cgroup: Store classid in struct sock Herbert Xu
2010-05-22 12:26                                               ` Neil Horman
2010-05-24  5:42                                                 ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-24  6:44                                               ` David Miller
2010-05-24  6:55                                                 ` David Miller
2010-05-24  7:07                                                   ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-24  7:14                                                     ` David Miller
2010-05-24 11:09                                                       ` Neil Horman
2010-05-24 11:24                                                         ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-19 14:10       ` tun: Use netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx Eric Dumazet
2010-05-19 14:31         ` Neil Horman
2010-05-19  8:20   ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-19  8:27     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-19  8:44       ` Herbert Xu
2010-05-19 20:14     ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100519.131448.200085502.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
    --cc=tgraf@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.