From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/17] wireless: update gfp/slab.h includes Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 10:45:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20100519144505.GD2412@tuxdriver.com> References: <1269885165-18617-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1269885165-18617-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20100519190230.52385a65.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:42858 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752110Ab0ESPAP (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 11:00:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100519190230.52385a65.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , "David S. Miller" On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 07:02:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi John, > > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 02:52:38 +0900 Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > Implicit slab.h inclusion via percpu.h is about to go away. Make sure > > gfp.h or slab.h is included as necessary. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > > Cc: Stephen Rothwell > > Cc: John W. Linville > I think that this patch is still needed in the wireless tree and I notice > that Dave has asked Linus to pull the net tree (containing the wireless > tree). I have been carrying this in linux-next. Looks like this was part of a series...who merged the rest of it? I guess I presumed they would take care of the series. Tejun, I wouldn't mind a repost, preferrably Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org... John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.