From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] autofs: Pushdown the bkl from ioctl Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 20:08:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20100519180832.GA9752@nowhere> References: <1274289855-10001-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1274289855-10001-3-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> <4BF4279C.2000805@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=v1ElfRkofrixSfd5cm1MfImmmZN4MkhvX37GkmciWAg=; b=cUZCkf09gxnmxeoJdRSWM1v+dGcRDPBG4Vweja4cOM5aozfk1d2KVp8ujc+9hWZETV wSxbxrcBSdVQ4ONlhyQE9rSD5MrYrku9ZiunLf48vW5RLZqP0RzifcJnMG/oMpKMnUO0 JtpiPNDGlqzqfxkoL0Cfrm7nY6z+37nU82W3M= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BF4279C.2000805@zytor.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML , Autofs , Thomas Gleixner , John Kacur , Arnd Bergmann On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:02:04AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 05/19/2010 10:24 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > * generate kernel reactions > > */ > > -static int autofs_root_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, > > +static int autofs_root_ioctl_unlocked(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, > > unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > > { > > struct autofs_sb_info *sbi = autofs_sbi(inode->i_sb); > > @@ -579,3 +579,16 @@ static int autofs_root_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, > > return -ENOSYS; > > } > > } > > + > > +static long autofs_root_ioctl(struct file *filp, > > + unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) > > +{ > > The choice of naming here seems reverse in my opinion. Oh, why? The function that holds the bkl calls its unlocked version.