From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from host4.kei.pl ([195.149.226.213] helo=smtp.host4.kei.pl) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFP3t-0003wP-O4 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 12:02:39 +0200 Received: (qmail 29315 invoked by uid 813007); 21 May 2010 09:58:36 -0000 X-clamdmail: clamdmail 0.18a Received: from 195.149.226.213 (HELO home.localnet) (marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl@195.149.226.213) by 195.149.226.213 with ESMTPA; 21 May 2010 09:58:36 -0000 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 11:58:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.32-22-generic; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201005211158.42460.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 195.149.226.213 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Problem with building glibc X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 10:02:39 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia pi=C4=85tek, 21 maja 2010 o 11:48:24 Grzegorz Toporek napisa=C5=82(a): > I would love to work with angstrom, however I'm using Colibri evaluation > board with Intel=C2=AE PXA270 Processor (this is a students project and I= can't > change it). Is it possible to run system built for angstrom on my board or > I just miss something?! Angstrom supports nearly every board which OpenEmbedded supports. Colibri i= s=20 just another device. Build Angstrom for it, use it and you will soon find o= ut=20 how much work you do not have to do due to feeds with already built softwar= e. Making own distribution and then properly maintain it is lot of work and I= =20 would never suggest that for someone who just started with OpenEmbedded. Also one thing: do not use tune-iwmmxt for Colibri. This does not give any= =20 special improvements for system. Add "iwmmxt" to MACHINE_FEATURES like it i= s=20 in few machines already - this will give you optimized versions of those=20 packages where it is really worth to enable that. And do not get flooded by Wis=C5=82a :D Regards,=20 =2D-=20 JID: hrw@jabber.org Website: http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcinjuszkiewicz