All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: DMAR:[fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear (firewire-ohci)
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 06:12:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100522121212.GQ10452@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF7B147.9020502@s5r6.in-berlin.de>

On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:26:15PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I came across a report of the subject message.  What does it mean; what
> type of bug should be look for?
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587178
> >>>
> firewire_ohci 0000:04:00.4: PCI INT C -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> firewire_ohci 0000:04:00.4: setting latency timer to 64
> firewire_ohci: Added fw-ohci device 0000:04:00.4, OHCI version 1.0
> DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
> DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [04:00.0] fault addr fffff000
> DMAR:[fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear
> DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [04:00.0] fault addr fffff000
> DMAR:[fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear
> DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [04:00.0] fault addr fffff000
> DMAR:[fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear
> <<<
> 
> The log sounds as if this happens during from-device DMA of 04:00.4 into
> a consistent buffer, yet the fault is logged for device 04:00.0.  The
> log is from a Dell M4500.  The devices are, according to a web search,
> 04:00.0 CardBus bridge [0607]: Ricoh Co Ltd Device [1180:e476] (rev 02)
> 04:00.4 FireWire (IEEE 1394) [0c00]: Ricoh Co Ltd Device [1180:e832]
> (rev 03) (prog-if 10)

I would guess that the DMAR can't distinguish between the different
devices behind the Cardbus bridge.  Adding Dave Woodhouse.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-22 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-22 10:26 DMAR:[fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear (firewire-ohci) Stefan Richter
2010-05-22 12:12 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2010-05-22 18:40   ` David Woodhouse
2010-05-22 19:09     ` Jesse Barnes
2010-05-30 14:18       ` Stefan Richter
2011-11-19 17:21       ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-30 16:16         ` Clemens Ladisch
2011-12-01  9:14           ` Tomáš Janoušek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100522121212.GQ10452@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.