All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>
To: dash@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wait regression in 3800d4
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 23:28:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100522212852.GA36029@stack.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100519190856.19606.qmail@ea7dd6dfa89c0a.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 07:08:56PM +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Hi, since commit 3800d49 the wait builtin shows some unexpected
> behavior, see http://bugs.debian.org/581425

> To reproduce:

>  $ dash -c '
>  for i in 1 2 3; do
>    (sleep $i; echo $i) &
>  done
>  wait
>  echo all done
>  sleep 2'
>  1
>  all done
>  2
>  3
>  $ 

> Expected output:
>  1
>  2
>  3
>  all done

> I don't completely understand commitdiff 3800d49, and didn't find time
> to fix the lack of understanding yet, but this patch seems to fix this
> specific issue.

> diff --git a/src/jobs.c b/src/jobs.c
> index a4fada0..57c0854 100644
> --- a/src/jobs.c
> +++ b/src/jobs.c
> @@ -1136,8 +1136,6 @@ waitproc(int block, int *status)
>                 if (err || !block)
>                         break;
>  
> -               block = 0;
> -
>                 sigfillset(&mask);
>                 sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &mask, &oldmask);
>  

This patch is not correct as it makes dash busy-wait for the second and
further processes to terminate. Also, I think aborting the wait builtin
with 128+SIGCHLD is the correct behaviour if a trap on CHLD is active
(like any other trap). This requires a more sophisticated handling of
pendingsigs so that an untrapped SIGCHLD does not overwrite a trapped
signal.

I wonder why this hasn't been noticed before, as this is the most common
use of the wait builtin. I can even reproduce the regression with the
test script in 3800d49's commit message: sometimes I see a line *** 148
meaning that the wait builtin was aborted by SIGCHLD (even though no
CHLD trap has been set); however only on an SMP system. (This is on
FreeBSD; I hacked mksignames.c to compile and work, although realtime
signals are missing.)

-- 
Jilles Tjoelker

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-22 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-19 19:08 wait regression in 3800d4 Gerrit Pape
2010-05-22 21:28 ` Jilles Tjoelker [this message]
2010-05-27 11:39   ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100522212852.GA36029@stack.nl \
    --to=jilles@stack.nl \
    --cc=dash@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.