[16/24] clockevent: Prevent dead lock on clockevents_lock

[Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>]

2.6.27-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------


From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>

This is a merge of two mainline commits, intended
for stable@kernel.org submission for 2.6.27 kernel.

commit f833bab87fca5c3ce13778421b1365845843b976
and

commit 918aae42aa9b611a3663b16ae849fdedc67c2292
Changelog of both:

    Currently clockevents_notify() is called with interrupts enabled at
    some places and interrupts disabled at some other places.

    This results in a deadlock in this scenario.

    cpu A holds clockevents_lock in clockevents_notify() with irqs enabled
    cpu B waits for clockevents_lock in clockevents_notify() with irqs disabled
    cpu C doing set_mtrr() which will try to rendezvous of all the cpus.

    This will result in C and A come to the rendezvous point and waiting
    for B. B is stuck forever waiting for the spinlock and thus not
    reaching the rendezvous point.

    Fix the clockevents code so that clockevents_lock is taken with
    interrupts disabled and thus avoid the above deadlock.

    Also call lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast() on the destination cpu so
    that we avoid calling smp_call_function() in the clockevents notifier
    chain.

    This issue left us wondering if we need to change the MTRR rendezvous
    logic to use stop machine logic (instead of smp_call_function) or add
    a check in spinlock debug code to see if there are other spinlocks
    which gets taken under both interrupts enabled/disabled conditions.

    Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
    Cc: "Brown Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
    Cc: stable@kernel.org
    LKML-Reference: <1250544899.2709.210.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

    I got following warning on ia64 box:
      In function 'acpi_processor_power_verify':
      642: warning: passing argument 2 of 'smp_call_function_single' from
      incompatible pointer type

    This smp_call_function_single() was introduced by a commit
    f833bab87fca5c3ce13778421b1365845843b976:

    The problem is that the lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast() has 2 versions:
    One is real code that modified in the above commit, and the other is NOP
    code that used when !ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3:

      static void lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr) { }

    So I got warning because of !ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3.

    We really want to do nothing here on !ARCH_APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3, so
    modify lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast() of real version to use
    smp_call_function_single() in it.

    Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
    Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>


---
 arch/x86/kernel/process.c     |    6 +-----
 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |   13 ++++++++++---
 kernel/time/clockevents.c     |   16 ++++++++++------
 kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c  |    7 +++----
 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -283,16 +283,12 @@ static void c1e_idle(void)
 		if (!cpu_isset(cpu, c1e_mask)) {
 			cpu_set(cpu, c1e_mask);
 			/*
-			 * Force broadcast so ACPI can not interfere. Needs
-			 * to run with interrupts enabled as it uses
-			 * smp_function_call.
+			 * Force broadcast so ACPI can not interfere.
 			 */
-			local_irq_enable();
 			clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_FORCE,
 					   &cpu);
 			printk(KERN_INFO "Switch to broadcast mode on CPU%d\n",
 			       cpu);
-			local_irq_disable();
 		}
 		clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER, &cpu);
 
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -317,8 +317,9 @@ static void acpi_timer_check_state(int s
 		pr->power.timer_broadcast_on_state = state;
 }
 
-static void acpi_propagate_timer_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+static void __lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast(void *arg)
 {
+	struct acpi_processor *pr = (struct acpi_processor *) arg;
 	unsigned long reason;
 
 	reason = pr->power.timer_broadcast_on_state < INT_MAX ?
@@ -327,6 +328,12 @@ static void acpi_propagate_timer_broadca
 	clockevents_notify(reason, &pr->id);
 }
 
+static void lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr)
+{
+	smp_call_function_single(pr->id, __lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast,
+				 (void *)pr, 1);
+}
+
 /* Power(C) State timer broadcast control */
 static void acpi_state_timer_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 				       struct acpi_processor_cx *cx,
@@ -347,7 +354,7 @@ static void acpi_state_timer_broadcast(s
 
 static void acpi_timer_check_state(int state, struct acpi_processor *pr,
 				   struct acpi_processor_cx *cstate) { }
-static void acpi_propagate_timer_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr) { }
+static void lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr) { }
 static void acpi_state_timer_broadcast(struct acpi_processor *pr,
 				       struct acpi_processor_cx *cx,
 				       int broadcast)
@@ -1177,7 +1184,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_power_verify(s
 			working++;
 	}
 
-	acpi_propagate_timer_broadcast(pr);
+	lapic_timer_propagate_broadcast(pr);
 
 	return (working);
 }
--- a/kernel/time/clockevents.c
+++ b/kernel/time/clockevents.c
@@ -124,11 +124,12 @@ int clockevents_program_event(struct clo
  */
 int clockevents_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret;
 
-	spin_lock(&clockevents_lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&clockevents_lock, flags);
 	ret = raw_notifier_chain_register(&clockevents_chain, nb);
-	spin_unlock(&clockevents_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockevents_lock, flags);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -165,6 +166,8 @@ static void clockevents_notify_released(
  */
 void clockevents_register_device(struct clock_event_device *dev)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
+
 	BUG_ON(dev->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED);
 	/*
 	 * A nsec2cyc multiplicator of 0 is invalid and we'd crash
@@ -175,13 +178,13 @@ void clockevents_register_device(struct
 		WARN_ON(1);
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&clockevents_lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&clockevents_lock, flags);
 
 	list_add(&dev->list, &clockevent_devices);
 	clockevents_do_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_ADD, dev);
 	clockevents_notify_released();
 
-	spin_unlock(&clockevents_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockevents_lock, flags);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -228,8 +231,9 @@ void clockevents_exchange_device(struct
 void clockevents_notify(unsigned long reason, void *arg)
 {
 	struct list_head *node, *tmp;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock(&clockevents_lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&clockevents_lock, flags);
 	clockevents_do_notify(reason, arg);
 
 	switch (reason) {
@@ -244,7 +248,7 @@ void clockevents_notify(unsigned long re
 	default:
 		break;
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&clockevents_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockevents_lock, flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clockevents_notify);
 #endif
--- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
@@ -205,11 +205,11 @@ static void tick_handle_periodic_broadca
  * Powerstate information: The system enters/leaves a state, where
  * affected devices might stop
  */
-static void tick_do_broadcast_on_off(void *why)
+static void tick_do_broadcast_on_off(unsigned long *reason)
 {
 	struct clock_event_device *bc, *dev;
 	struct tick_device *td;
-	unsigned long flags, *reason = why;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int cpu, bc_stopped;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&tick_broadcast_lock, flags);
@@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ void tick_broadcast_on_off(unsigned long
 		printk(KERN_ERR "tick-broadcast: ignoring broadcast for "
 		       "offline CPU #%d\n", *oncpu);
 	else
-		smp_call_function_single(*oncpu, tick_do_broadcast_on_off,
-					 &reason, 1);
+		tick_do_broadcast_on_off(&reason);
 }
 
 /*