From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-px0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGm20-00038I-2M for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 06:46:20 +0200 Received: by pxi14 with SMTP id 14so1609221pxi.6 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 21:42:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mRlTli74LIumV/EIriuKWjK9KhF5GzlLujkKmGm30jg=; b=ibFK0UeK79urD2GkiePbxTLYbxSfKxnPpxxGoVcq9a3ZqNlzSHpKqbuBAjjFTyQ48Q IiYskjbxR36XHtwTvAH4plXE8KpePkEtJ4dlSr6IdAxTxowPswPxJwgpbtRzZomgetBv 9OV2rq3zTFY9dYganX2S7rXT7TKC3LGy/Vp/o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Ial+v0DDo+5GYq0bE6q4vjGN+MWw3AX21H3og4roSc9iHEplgdTRGkNwuF7rutZlpw /JCBrmYBvQBASymRgiK6DbQtdGY6S6Vs7OgnxA9CkqI7NpBNh2qrHOtLAyWG/nEp7lUS tWCY9hmQs4rCZIEclgvo8JudVn2Mp+H5slBqk= Received: by 10.142.152.39 with SMTP id z39mr462651wfd.336.1274762532612; Mon, 24 May 2010 21:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (99-57-141-118.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.57.141.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm4091825pzk.7.2010.05.24.21.42.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 24 May 2010 21:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 21:42:02 -0700 From: Khem Raj To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100525044202.GA25134@gmail.com> References: <1274733028-13432-1-git-send-email-clarson@kergoth.com> <20100524233325.GJ25484@denix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100524233325.GJ25484@denix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.212.175 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: raj.khem@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Cc: Chris Larson Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Rename url params patch=/pnum= to apply={yes, no}/striplevel= X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 04:46:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On (24/05/10 19:33), Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 01:30:27PM -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > > From: Chris Larson > > > > I think this makes the behavior rather more clear. > > Ironically, just earlier today I was trying to explain to somebody, that > patch=3 does not mean or do anything... > > It maybe more clear for new users, but once you use it couple times, it > doesn't matter if it's patch/pnum or apply/striplevel. But I see where you > going with the second patch. > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Larson > > Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko Acked-by: Khem Raj > > > diff --git a/classes/patch.bbclass b/classes/patch.bbclass > > index a739b20..6ef408f 100644 > > --- a/classes/patch.bbclass > > +++ b/classes/patch.bbclass > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel