From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ksp.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.206]:43655 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756183Ab0EZRiC (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2010 13:38:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:37:54 +0200 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/25] msm: generalize clock support. Message-ID: <20100526173753.GD9069@elf.ucw.cz> References: <> <1273700754-10256-6-git-send-email-dwalker@codeaurora.org> <20100524185540.GA1292@ucw.cz> <20100525005115.GA7791@huya.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100525005115.GA7791@huya.qualcomm.com> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Brown Cc: Daniel Walker , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Abhijeet Dharmapurikar , Gregory Bean , Stepan Moskovchenko , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On Tue 2010-05-25 00:51:15, David Brown wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:55:40AM -0700, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > > > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are > > > + * met: > > > > Is this even GPL compatible? > > Um, this is a standard 3-clause BSD license. There are nearly > 900 existing files in the kernel that have this license on them. Are you sure? I believe that Dual GPL/BSD is ok, just BSD is not. pavel@amd:/data/l/linux-good$ less ./include/linux/license.h #ifndef __LICENSE_H #define __LICENSE_H static inline int license_is_gpl_compatible(const char *license) { return (strcmp(license, "GPL") == 0 || strcmp(license, "GPL v2") == 0 || strcmp(license, "GPL and additional rights") == 0 || strcmp(license, "Dual BSD/GPL") == 0 || strcmp(license, "Dual MIT/GPL") == 0 || strcmp(license, "Dual MPL/GPL") == 0); } Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek) Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:37:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 05/25] msm: generalize clock support. In-Reply-To: <20100525005115.GA7791@huya.qualcomm.com> References: <> <1273700754-10256-6-git-send-email-dwalker@codeaurora.org> <20100524185540.GA1292@ucw.cz> <20100525005115.GA7791@huya.qualcomm.com> Message-ID: <20100526173753.GD9069@elf.ucw.cz> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue 2010-05-25 00:51:15, David Brown wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:55:40AM -0700, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > > > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are > > > + * met: > > > > Is this even GPL compatible? > > Um, this is a standard 3-clause BSD license. There are nearly > 900 existing files in the kernel that have this license on them. Are you sure? I believe that Dual GPL/BSD is ok, just BSD is not. pavel at amd:/data/l/linux-good$ less ./include/linux/license.h #ifndef __LICENSE_H #define __LICENSE_H static inline int license_is_gpl_compatible(const char *license) { return (strcmp(license, "GPL") == 0 || strcmp(license, "GPL v2") == 0 || strcmp(license, "GPL and additional rights") == 0 || strcmp(license, "Dual BSD/GPL") == 0 || strcmp(license, "Dual MIT/GPL") == 0 || strcmp(license, "Dual MPL/GPL") == 0); } Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html