diff for duplicates of <201005262113.38450.marek.vasut@gmail.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index dec7c32..31ce0f3 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -Dne St 26. května 2010 20:43:58 Russell King - ARM Linux napsal(a): +Dne St 26. kv?tna 2010 20:43:58 Russell King - ARM Linux napsal(a): > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:07:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Why are "readl"s protected by spinlock anyway ? Can't we just move the > > locking past the code above ? @@ -13,7 +13,3 @@ Russell, Julia, check the patch I posted. Comments are welcome. btw. Russell, killing the spinlock in resume might be overkill. If there was any reason for that being there, it was for the write ops so I'd rather keep those locked. Anyone with actual hardware available should look into that though. --- -To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in -the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org -More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 65cdc81..5aadf70 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ "ref\0Pine.LNX.4.64.1005261756000.23743@ask.diku.dk\0" "ref\0201005261907.06198.marek.vasut@gmail.com\0" "ref\020100526184358.GC6232@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk\0" - "From\0Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 7/17] arch/arm/common: Add missing spin_unlock_irqrestore\0" - "Date\0Wed, 26 May 2010 19:13:37 +0000\0" + "From\0marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH 7/17] arch/arm/common: Add missing spin_unlock_irqrestore\0" + "Date\0Wed, 26 May 2010 21:13:37 +0200\0" "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "Dne St 26. kv\303\204\342\200\272tna 2010 20:43:58 Russell King - ARM Linux napsal(a):\n" + "Dne St 26. kv?tna 2010 20:43:58 Russell King - ARM Linux napsal(a):\n" "> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:07:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:\n" "> > Why are \"readl\"s protected by spinlock anyway ? Can't we just move the\n" "> > locking past the code above ?\n" @@ -21,10 +21,6 @@ "\n" "btw. Russell, killing the spinlock in resume might be overkill. If there was any \n" "reason for that being there, it was for the write ops so I'd rather keep those \n" - "locked. Anyone with actual hardware available should look into that though.\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe kernel-janitors\" in\n" - "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n" - More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html + locked. Anyone with actual hardware available should look into that though. -b4b1b1bf413bed8d1592cd9b6b25f0d31a8dbba42e297abb5dbb88f0532e1ca5 +7e9800dace7426261e4fc67e97ac01dd512535b055ef6bec2d70929324e1f311
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index dec7c32..b10fef0 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -Dne St 26. kvÄ›tna 2010 20:43:58 Russell King - ARM Linux napsal(a): +Dne St 26. května 2010 20:43:58 Russell King - ARM Linux napsal(a): > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:07:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Why are "readl"s protected by spinlock anyway ? Can't we just move the > > locking past the code above ? @@ -13,7 +13,3 @@ Russell, Julia, check the patch I posted. Comments are welcome. btw. Russell, killing the spinlock in resume might be overkill. If there was any reason for that being there, it was for the write ops so I'd rather keep those locked. Anyone with actual hardware available should look into that though. --- -To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in -the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org -More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 65cdc81..7b00c4b 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -3,11 +3,15 @@ "ref\020100526184358.GC6232@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk\0" "From\0Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 7/17] arch/arm/common: Add missing spin_unlock_irqrestore\0" - "Date\0Wed, 26 May 2010 19:13:37 +0000\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "Date\0Wed, 26 May 2010 21:13:37 +0200\0" + "To\0Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>\0" + "Cc\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" + Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + " kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "Dne St 26. kv\303\204\342\200\272tna 2010 20:43:58 Russell King - ARM Linux napsal(a):\n" + "Dne St 26. kv\304\233tna 2010 20:43:58 Russell King - ARM Linux napsal(a):\n" "> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:07:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:\n" "> > Why are \"readl\"s protected by spinlock anyway ? Can't we just move the\n" "> > locking past the code above ?\n" @@ -21,10 +25,6 @@ "\n" "btw. Russell, killing the spinlock in resume might be overkill. If there was any \n" "reason for that being there, it was for the write ops so I'd rather keep those \n" - "locked. Anyone with actual hardware available should look into that though.\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe kernel-janitors\" in\n" - "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n" - More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html + locked. Anyone with actual hardware available should look into that though. -b4b1b1bf413bed8d1592cd9b6b25f0d31a8dbba42e297abb5dbb88f0532e1ca5 +bd25ab50724aea0e4fd61fb4ffb455187f94d3c8fb9a30d6116cff11532cfdd0
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.