From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 21:15:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sa1111: Prevent deadlock in resume path
In-Reply-To: <20100526191425.GD6232@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1274901104-22133-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<20100526191425.GD6232@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <201005262115.57282.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Dne St 26. kv?tna 2010 21:14:25 Russell King - ARM Linux napsal(a):
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:11:44PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > This patch reorganises the sa1111_resume() function in a manner the
> > spinlock happens after calling the sa1111_wake(). This fixes two bugs:
> > 
> > 1) This function called sa1111_wake() which tried to claim the same
> > spinlock
> > 
> >    the sa1111_resume() already claimed. This would result in certain
> >    deadlock.
> >    
> >    Original idea for this part: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > 
> > 2) The function didn't unlock the spinlock in case the chip didn't report
> > 
> >    correct ID.
> >    
> >    Original idea for this part: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
> 
> Yea, good enough.

You want me to fight your patch tracking system or will you just merge it into 
your tree ?