From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ciprian Docan <docan@eden.rutgers.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: don't hold s_umount over close_bdev_exclusive() call
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 05:45:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100527044528.GZ31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100525083003.GE23411@kernel.dk>
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:30:03AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, May 22 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > This patch fixes an obscure AB-BA deadlock in get_sb_bdev().
> >
> > When a superblock is mounted more than once get_sb_bdev() calls
> > close_bdev_exclusive() to drop the extra bdev reference while holding
> > s_umount. However, sb->s_umount nests inside bd_mutex during
> > __invalidate_device() and close_bdev_exclusive() acquires bd_mutex
> > during blkdev_put(); thus creating an AB-BA deadlock.
> >
> > This condition doesn't trigger frequently. For this condition to be
> > visible to lockdep, the filesystem must occupy the whole device (as
> > __invalidate_device() only grabs bd_mutex for the whole device), the
> > FS must be mounted more than once and partition rescan should be
> > issued while the FS is still mounted.
> >
> > Fix it by dropping s_umount over close_bdev_exclusive().
>
> Looks safe to me, since it has (as you note) an elevated ref count.
Ehh... It's probably OK, but I'm worried about the interplay with
->bd_fsfreeze_mutex logics there ;-/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-20 16:34 possible circular locking dependency detected Ciprian Docan
2010-05-21 21:14 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-22 14:52 ` [PATCH] vfs: don't hold s_umount over close_bdev_exclusive() call Tejun Heo
2010-05-25 8:30 ` Jens Axboe
2010-05-27 4:45 ` Al Viro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100527044528.GZ31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=docan@eden.rutgers.edu \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.