From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@au1.ibm.com>,
shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 3/4] PPC64-HWBKPT: Handle concurrent alignment interrupts
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:11:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100528074135.GA10511@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100527062044.GB4105@drongo>
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:20:44PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 02:44:35PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
>
> > An alignment interrupt may intervene between a DSI/hw-breakpoint exception
> > and the single-step exception. Enable the alignment interrupt (through
> > modifications to emulate_single_step()) to notify the single-step exception
> > handler for proper restoration of hw-breakpoints.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: K.Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 7 ++-----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.ppc64_test/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.ppc64_test.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.ppc64_test/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> > @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ void RunModeException(struct pt_regs *re
> >
> > void __kprobes single_step_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > {
> > - regs->msr &= ~(MSR_SE | MSR_BE); /* Turn off 'trace' bits */
> > + clear_single_step(regs);
> >
> > if (notify_die(DIE_SSTEP, "single_step", regs, 5,
> > 5, SIGTRAP) == NOTIFY_STOP)
> > @@ -621,10 +621,7 @@ void __kprobes single_step_exception(str
> > */
> > static void emulate_single_step(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > {
> > - if (single_stepping(regs)) {
> > - clear_single_step(regs);
> > - _exception(SIGTRAP, regs, TRAP_TRACE, 0);
> > - }
> > + single_step_exception(regs);
> > }
>
> We still need the if (single_stepping(regs)) in emulate_single_step.
> We don't want to send the process a SIGTRAP every time it gets an
> alignment interrupt. :)
>
> Paul.
Agreed, and made changes to that effect in version XXII (as seen in
patch linuxppc-dev message-id: 20100528064017.GD8679@in.ibm.com).
Thanks,
K.Prasad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-28 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100525083055.342788418@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2010-05-25 9:13 ` [Patch 1/4] Allow arch-specific cleanup before breakpoint unregistration K.Prasad
2010-05-25 9:13 ` K.Prasad
2010-05-25 11:39 ` Millton Miller
2010-05-25 11:39 ` Millton Miller
2010-05-26 6:51 ` K.Prasad
2010-05-26 9:54 ` David Howells
2010-05-26 9:54 ` David Howells
2010-05-26 15:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-26 15:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-05-26 17:17 ` K.Prasad
2010-05-26 17:17 ` K.Prasad
2010-05-26 17:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-26 17:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-26 17:31 ` K.Prasad
2010-05-26 17:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-26 17:28 ` K.Prasad
2010-05-26 17:28 ` K.Prasad
2010-05-25 9:14 ` [Patch 2/4] PPC64-HWBKPT: Implement hw-breakpoints for PowerPC BookIII S K.Prasad
2010-05-27 6:19 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-05-28 7:39 ` K.Prasad
2010-05-25 9:14 ` [Patch 3/4] PPC64-HWBKPT: Handle concurrent alignment interrupts K.Prasad
2010-05-27 6:20 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-05-28 7:41 ` K.Prasad [this message]
2010-05-25 9:15 ` [Patch 4/4] PPC64-HWBKPT: Enable hw-breakpoints while handling intervening signals K.Prasad
2010-05-27 6:32 ` Paul Mackerras
[not found] <20100524102614.040177456@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2010-05-24 10:33 ` [Patch 3/4] PPC64-HWBKPT: Handle concurrent alignment interrupts K.Prasad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100528074135.GA10511@in.ibm.com \
--to=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=dwg@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.