From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] revised patch for arch/tile/ support Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 13:29:10 +0200 Message-ID: <201005291329.10941.arnd@arndb.de> References: <201005200543.o4K5hFRF006079@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> <201005290333.o4T3Xjse029917@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:63975 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756005Ab0E2L3b (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2010 07:29:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201005290333.o4T3Xjse029917@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Chris Metcalf Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org On Saturday 29 May 2010, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On May 20 I wrote: > > At Tilera we have been running Linux 2.6.26 on our architecture for a > > while and distributing the sources to our customers. We just sync'ed up > > our sources to 2.6.34 and would like to return it to the community more > > widely, so I'm hoping to take advantage of the merge window for 2.6.35 > > to integrate support for our architecture. > > Thanks to some much-appreciated volunteer work reviewing that initial > patch, I now have a revised set of patches which I would like to offer > for submission to the mainline. It seems that you have addressed all my review comments and all the other comments that I have seen in the best possible ways. All the controversial parts from the original code are either corrected or (in case of nonessential drivers) deferred to a future review. I did not expect this to be possibly in such a short time, and it continues to amaze me. Consequently, I fully support this series to go into 2.6.35. To the entire series: Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann