From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mchan@broadcom.com, grundler@parisc-linux.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2: Fix IRQ failures during kdump.
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 19:24:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100530012401.GC9132@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100529.160527.108793180.davem@davemloft.net>
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 04:05:27PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
> Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 09:22:07 -0700
>
> > I think there may be more issues after thinking about it some more.
> > The device is essentially still active at this time. The PCI
> > layer can turn off certain things, but enabling INTX can lead to
> > "irq x: nobody cared" if the driver is not ready for it. The
> > device really needs to be reset by the driver to be totally
> > reliable.
>
> We still have to find some generic way to do this.
>
> My position still stands, and it is entirely rediculious to
> have every single driver have to attend to all of these
> esoteric details just to handle interrupts properly. Drivers
> are hard enough to write as-is.
I think we can do this generically. PCI has disable bits for MSI,
MSI-X and pin-based interrupts. So we can leave MSIs enabled, but disable
interrupt generation.
We should probably set the interrupt type back to pin-based before the
kexec kernel starts, right? Or do we expect drivers to handle being
initialised with the device still set to MSI mode?
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-30 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-29 3:24 [PATCH] bnx2: Fix IRQ failures during kdump Michael Chan
2010-05-29 5:33 ` David Miller
2010-05-29 6:45 ` Grant Grundler
2010-05-29 6:50 ` David Miller
2010-05-29 16:22 ` Michael Chan
2010-05-29 23:05 ` David Miller
2010-05-30 1:24 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2010-05-30 3:49 ` David Miller
2010-05-30 9:44 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-30 16:32 ` Michael Chan
2010-05-29 16:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-30 9:43 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-30 16:12 ` Michael Chan
2010-05-30 17:30 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-31 4:43 ` Michael Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100530012401.GC9132@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.