From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] first step toward the new truncate sequence Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:07:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20100601100732.GA31911@lst.de> References: <20100530204932.GA21002@lst.de> <4C038648.4030304@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, npiggin@suse.de, jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:57580 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751364Ab0FAKHi (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:07:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C038648.4030304@panasas.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:50:00PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > I'm basing the first attempt on Al's next tree that has Nicks last > patches. Will rebase on these when they get into that tree. Please > advise on the best tree to use? > (BTW did you mean 2.6.35 above, I guess) That really depends on Al's merge plans. > So one minor thing ext2_setsize can be static: > (It used to be used by the struct inode_operations) Indeed, I'll fold it into a related patch in my third batch.