From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 07:56:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100602145653.GA2385@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinNygSdXsg3vAVRHttAMh6nX4tauNKn3XnfQC_x@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:06:13PM +0100, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> With 2.6.35-rc1 and your patch in the context below, we still see
> "include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without
> protection!", so need this additional patch:
>
> Acquire read-side RCU lock around task_group() calls, addressing
> "include/linux/cgroup.h:534 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without
> protection!" warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Thank you, Daniel! I have queued this for 2.6.35.
I had to apply the patch by hand due to line wrapping. Could you please
check your email-agent settings? This simple patch was no problem to
hand apply, but for a larger patch this process would be both tedious
and error prone.
Thanx, Paul
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index 217e4a9..50ec9ea 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -1241,6 +1241,7 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd,
> struct task_struct *p, int sync)
> * effect of the currently running task from the load
> * of the current CPU:
> */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> if (sync) {
> tg = task_group(current);
> weight = current->se.load.weight;
> @@ -1250,6 +1251,7 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd,
> struct task_struct *p, int sync)
> }
>
> tg = task_group(p);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> weight = p->se.load.weight;
>
> imbalance = 100 + (sd->imbalance_pct - 100) / 2;
>
> ---
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 02:35:43PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:38:28AM -0400, Miles Lane wrote:
> Excellent. Here are the results on my machine. .config appended.
> First, thank you very much for testing this, Miles!
>
> And as Tetsuo Handa pointed out privately, my patch was way broken.
>
> Here is an updated version.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> commit b15e561ed91b7a366c3cc635026f3b9ce6483070
> Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed Apr 21 14:04:56 2010 -0700
>
> sched: protect __sched_setscheduler() access to cgroups
>
> A given task's cgroups structures must remain while that task is running
> due to reference counting, so this is presumably a false positive.
> Updated to reflect feedback from Tetsuo Handa.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 14c44ec..f425a2b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -4575,9 +4575,13 @@ recheck:
> * Do not allow realtime tasks into groups that have no runtime
> * assigned.
> */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> if (rt_bandwidth_enabled() && rt_policy(policy) &&
> - task_group(p)->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime == 0)
> + task_group(p)->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime == 0) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return -EPERM;
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> #endif
>
> retval = security_task_setscheduler(p, policy, param);
> --
> Daniel J Blueman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-02 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-01 13:06 [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Daniel J Blueman
2010-06-02 14:56 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-06-02 15:24 ` Daniel J Blueman
2010-06-03 9:22 ` Li Zefan
2010-06-03 18:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-04 2:44 ` Li Zefan
2010-06-04 4:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-04 8:54 ` Daniel J Blueman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-08 1:26 INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage - include/linux/cgroup.h:492 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! Miles Lane
2010-03-11 3:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-12 18:44 ` Eric Paris
2010-04-12 18:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-14 10:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 18:26 ` Eric Paris
2010-04-19 23:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-20 1:25 ` Eric Paris
2010-04-20 3:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-20 8:23 ` [PATCH] RCU: don't turn off lockdep when find suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Lai Jiangshan
2010-04-20 8:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-20 12:31 ` Eric Paris
2010-04-20 13:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <j2ya44ae5cd1004200545q6be4ec82o18ae99d93e8c29c7@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-20 13:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-20 15:38 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-21 6:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-04-21 21:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 21:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 21:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 21:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-21 22:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-21 23:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-22 14:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-04-22 16:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 12:50 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-23 19:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-23 22:59 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-24 5:35 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-25 2:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-25 2:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-25 7:45 ` Johannes Berg
2010-04-25 7:49 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 2:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-25 15:49 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-25 20:20 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-26 16:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-26 18:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-04-27 4:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-27 16:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-27 16:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 17:58 ` Miles Lane
2010-04-27 23:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-27 23:42 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 23:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <p2ka44ae5cd1004281358n86ce29d2tbece16b2fb974dab@mail.gmail.com>
2010-04-28 21:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-01 17:26 ` Miles Lane
2010-05-01 21:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-02 2:00 ` Miles Lane
2010-05-02 4:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100602145653.GA2385@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.blueman@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.