From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 3 Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:22:56 +0930 Message-ID: <201006032222.57411.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20100603134753.710a64b3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:53629 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752385Ab0FCMxB (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 08:53:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Dave Young Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Linus Torvalds On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 05:30:09 pm Dave Young wrote: > Seems for some module drop reference of 0 in following code of init_module: > > /* Drop initial reference. */ > module_put(mod); Thanks Dave, good bug report. It was "module: refactor load_module part 4" where I initialized the per-cpu pointer before allocating it: static int module_unload_init(struct module *mod) { ... /* Hold reference count during initialization. */ __this_cpu_write(mod->refptr->incs, 1); ... mod->refptr = alloc_percpu(struct module_ref); ... This also explains Stephen's crash during module load (which was more expected since refptr is NULL, though percpu ptrs don't work that way). I've fixed it (by reversing the order of those lines) for tomorrow's linux-next. Thanks! Rusty.