From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA4F5B7D61 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2010 03:44:46 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 19:44:37 +0200 From: Olaf Hering To: Sean MacLennan Subject: Re: [PATCH] [powerpc] do not expect executable permissions for in-tree shell scripts Message-ID: <20100605174437.GA16229@aepfle.de> References: <20100605081039.GA21300@aepfle.de> <20100605133210.11f504c3@opus.seanm.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <20100605133210.11f504c3@opus.seanm.ca> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, stable@kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Jun 05, Sean MacLennan wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 10:10:39 +0200 > Olaf Hering wrote: > > > scripts in the kernel source do not have executable permissions if > > they were created with patch(1) run mkuboot.sh with bash, its tagged > > as bash script. > > Wouldn't it be better to use ${SHELL}? Not every system has bash. Maybe. As it stands right now, mkuboot.sh does not run without bash. And: Reality check please. A _development system_ without bash, installed per default on every sane Linux distro, does most likely not exist. Olaf