From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED usage in pcibios_fixup_device_resources()
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:05:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100607030504.GC4258@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201006031638.33726.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:04:30AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thursday, June 03, 2010 06:42:53 pm Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:38:32PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > The SH implementation of pcibios_fixup_device_resources() does the
> > > equivalent of pcibios_bus_to_resource() for all the resources of a
> > > device, except that it skips resources with the IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED
> > > flag set.
> > >
> > > This looks like a bug to me. IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED means the resource
> > > cannot be moved, not that we should skip pcibios_bus_to_resource().
> > >
> > > Does anybody know why pcibios_fixup_device_resources() does this check?
> > >
> > > The only other IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED reference I see in arch/sh is in
> > > gapspci_fixup_resources(), so maybe it has something to do with that?
> > >
> > gapspci is a very special case, in that it's not really PCI but a bit of
> > mangling logic in a custom ASIC that interfaces an 8139 ethernet device
> > directly on to an ISA-style bus. If you take a look at
> > arch/sh/drivers/pci/fixups-dreamcast.c you can see where the flag is set
> > and the rationale behind it.
>
> Yes, using IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED in gapspci_fixup_resources() sounds
> reasonable; it's just that it doesn't make sense to test for it in
> pcibios_fixup_device_resources() or pcibios_bus_to_resource().
>
> > Looking at the code again though it seems like pcibios_bus_to_resource()
> > will not cause any problems, especially given that the io and mem offsets
> > are both cleared to 0 for that controller. I'll kill off the test from
> > pcibios_fixup_device_resources(), I assume this was a remnant from the
> > old pci-auto code which we moved off of some time ago.
>
> Thanks. I'll watch for your checkin. I'm working on some patches
> to move the generic parts of pcibios_fixup_bus() out of the arches
> and into drivers/pci, and that depends on this change.
>
I've checked in a fix for this now, which I'll send to Linus for -rc3.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-07 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-03 22:38 IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED usage in pcibios_fixup_device_resources() Bjorn Helgaas
2010-06-04 0:42 ` Paul Mundt
2010-06-04 16:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-06-07 3:05 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100607030504.GC4258@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.